Quote:
Originally Posted by asaris
But I *like* having a President and Vice-President who don't always agree with each other. Better than the one just being a rubber stamp; helps prevent groupthink.
|
You can have disagreement, discussion, debate, etc. and still have one strong leader, one who takes accountability for a course of action and expects the others to support the final decision 100%.
-----Added 23/10/2008 at 11 : 30 : 06-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by murp0434
yup pretty much hit the nail on the head. The problem here is the lack of image cohesion.
|
Are you focused on "image"? I find it more important to look at, values, principles, actions and results. I could careless about "image". If a person is doing good, what difference does it make if they have on a $20 jacket from Goodwill or a $2,000 jacket from wherever people buy $2,000 jackets (I don't know).
-----Added 23/10/2008 at 11 : 33 : 25-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paq
i dunno, if i were a normal RNC backer and i'd donated enough for a small house..and then i saw that it was being spent to buy her a new wardrobe instead of ads in swing states...i'd be a bit aggravated.
that's just me
|
This is why I am more inclined to donate my time to causes rather than money. Once you give the money you have to assume it may be spent in ways you don't support. Also, one reason why I support lower taxes, government tends to spend money on stuff that "aggravates" me all the time.