10-22-2008, 12:54 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
Junkie
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by smooth
I don't think you get punitive damages for salary disputes. I could be wrong, but they aren't generally awarded over contractual disputes and the behaviors has to be malicious and egregious; I also think juries award punitive damages and judges can adjust them. There's probably a lot more to it, civil law is a world apart from criminal law, but whatever the type of damages are not what's at issue here so if I were you I'd drop that prong of your argument unless you were absolutely sure (as in looked it up yourself and read the relevant cases, not damn I'm never wrong sure) because it's not going to add any weight to your point.
there's obviously an argument to be made for the way things currently are, I'd start by reading the supreme's decision, but it only harms rather than helps one's stance to form spurious arguments.
|
Different types of damages are available. Here is a case:
Quote:
In an EEOC lawsuit under EPA and Title VII, a federal jury awarded $2.2 million to a former employee of Outback Steakhouse who alleged that the restaurant chain discriminated against her by paying a male counterpart a significantly larger salary and then firing her after she complained. Following four days of trial, the jury deliberated about five hours before awarding the female plaintiff $27,000 for the difference in earnings, $36,800 in back pay, $50,000 in compensatory damages for emotional pain and suffering, and $2.1 million in punitive damages.
|
Highlights of Equal Pay Act Cases
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."
|
|
|