Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
And what point would that be?
|
That the main point of your OP is bunk. One would expect such an astute economic expert as yourself wouldn't be so confused by the fairly straightforward reason that women are on average paid less than men among Obama's campaign staff.
I'm more interested in the disparities between what the different campaigns have paid Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae lobbyists (as in, which campaign has employed them as campaign staff) and how those disparities mesh with each campaigns professed desires about "keeping the special interests out of Washington," but that's just me.
By all means, let's talk about distorted interpretations of statistics like they aren't distortions and then act all incredulous when we're ignored.