View Single Post
Old 10-14-2008, 06:45 PM   #34 (permalink)
The_Dunedan
Junkie
 
I don't know why I'm doing this, but here goes...


Quote:
step one is to translate your premises out of the cloud of rightwing gobble-de-gook that they currently framed in, and pose on that basis questions that are worth the trouble of addressing.
You first. I have yet to see you post anything which isn't some equally impenetrable form of leftwing gobble-do-gook.

Quote:
well, first of all i have no faith at all that any conservative actually knows what socialism is.
A system of economic organization wherein the means of production is owned, primarily or in total, by the State or, in some understandings, any collective body. There; care to retract that snide little gem?

Quote:
it is an empty category around which various nitwit projections get clustered. the defining features of socialism--democratic socialism anyway--have nothing to do with tax rates, particularly not taken in isolation.
Except that when you tax someone's earnings, you're taxing all the time, effort, and thought he put into making that money. You are now taking ownership of one of the crucial means of production (capital) by force and transferring its' control to the State. Moreover, you are ex post facto taking possession of the time, effort, and thought which went into making that money: howzit feel to be a Slave Owner? Means of production under control of the State; Socialism.

Quote:
one of the main features of a democratic socialist system is a political orientation toward full employment.
how anyone gets from that to any of these conservative cliche's about "sitting on your hands" is beyond me
If you -really- need an answer to that, come check out my neighborhood (such as it is.) 60+ able-bodied adults, 4 people with jobs. The rest sit on their arses and drink Nyquil all day while drawing checks because they can. Because the system allows them to do so. What you "liberals" frequently fail to realize is that some people are just plain lazy, stupid, and happy that way: they're perfectly happy to be subsidised with my money. Giving these people a job is like giving The Tragedy of Othello to a milk cow: she doesn't want it, wouldn't know what to do with it if she did, and is perfectly happy with the Status Quo.

Quote:
it's really just a transfer of wealth from one place to another--nothing moral about it---a political consensus is what matters.
So let me get this straight. I'm walking down the street at night and I run into three other guys. They pull guns and demand my money (3:1 majority rules seems like a political consensus). I pay them because I don't want to wake up missing my kidneys tomorrow. They leave with my money (transferring my wealth from my pockets into their own) and I go home without the paycheck I worked all week for. And you find this acceptable?! Please tell me I'm misreading your leftwing gobble-de-gook here: I haven't been a Communist in some years and I'm afraid I've lost my ear for the language.

Quote:
the "effects" on the "welfare class" is in another matter, another conservative fever dream.
So my whole street, all three burnt-out meth-labs, child-molester, Church-cheating welfare queens with the Dodge Ram 'n all, is an hallucination? Fascinating...

Quote:
it is a mystery to me why people choose to believe it
Because we can look out our windows and see it, it's kind of like trees that way.

Quote:
job retraining. high wages. relatively tightly regulated work conditions. profit sharing. shared control over the management of the workplace with employees (through proxies typically on the order of facility committees--personally, i'm in favor of a more radical form of direct-democratic control over the workplace, but that's another matter.)
All enforced at the point of a gun. Why is it, I wonder, that you lefties are so disinclined to acknowledge this aspect of your pipe-dreams? Every single one of those nice little ideas up there would be enforced upon others by violence or the threat of violence. Funny how "evil" Capitalism is predicated upon mutually beneficial voluntary exchange, while "good" Communism or Socialism is based on threatening to blow someone's face off.

Quote:
because the state is involved more extensively and explicitly in the shaping of system parameters, those parameters become political. this makes them MORE responsive to democratic control. the american model of disappearing state functions behind an illusion of "free markets" is about REDUCING responsiveness to democratic pressure and LIMITING the ability of people to impact upon how the system operates.

i don't know why that's desirable.
Because the world is full of deeply, deeply stupid people who have no business trying to run a trotline, let alone an enterprise with more than two people. Stupid people vote for stupid things, and stupid things are something I do my level best to avoid. Unfortunately, stupid people voting for stupid things frequently succeed in getting them, as witness almost everything Congress has done in the past eight years.

Quote:
i am pleased to see the "free market" ideology, and its ultra-right variant in anarcho-conservative "libertarian" thinking being pulverized by events unfolding in the world.
Why in God's name would you think that was what you were seeing? This is Mercantilism or Corporatism or Fascism (take your pick) failing under its' own weight, not Capitalism. Capitalism disallows the Gov't interference and distortion of Markets which created this problem in the first place, especially the ridiculous notion of "Corporate Personhood" which allowed the monstrosity known as Corporate Welfare (AKA The Big Bad Bailout) to exist in the first place.

Quote:
how is it possible for example to erase the history of actually existing capitalism--which is only a coherent social system--that is the dominant mode of production at the scale we now are accumstomed to thinking about--after 1870. capitalism as a dominant mode of production has been remarkably unstable--depression in the 1870s, depression in the 1890s...world war...depression in the 1920s and into the 1930s--world war.
Again, NONE of this is Capitalism! Capitalism was destroyed in the US by the 1850s, mostly thanks to the Eerie, and was buried 12 feet deep by that treasonous scumbag Abraham Lincoln's War Department.
The_Dunedan is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360