Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgeedo
"If you are going to critique a class of people, you should at least present a stronger case." Why? Do you seriously think that a few well turned phrases will convert the various Liberals on this forum from the error of their ways? My intent is to incite a lively discussion and get a variety of opinions. In spite of what you might think, I enjoy hearing the opinions of others and I occassionally learn something, even from Liberals.
|
So wait a minute...are you saying that the liberal viewpoint on this issue is erroneous? But I thought you wanted a lively discussion? A discussion of what? How "wrong" liberals are about a conservative view of taxation?
I would comment more, offering a well-thought-out opinion except I don't see a way of doing so constructively based on the OP. If anything, I would rather critique the piece you've provided as support material, but I don't think that was your intent. Actually, I'm still uncertain of your intent. Do you want us to discuss, in a more general sense, the distribution of wealth within the context of governmental morality? If this is the case, maybe I'll think about it some and provide my own backgrounder. As it is, I can't discuss it based on this op-ed piece you've posted. It's not conducive to an open discussion on the matter. There are many problems with the piece, even internally.
If, however, your intent is to have us discuss this from the viewpoint of the op-ed piece, then we have a different discussion altogether.
What is it you want?