Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
Neeways, DC brings up a good point in citing the frighteningly open language in the laws about presidential use of the armed forces. Is that being cited as the legality of having an active ongoing military presence on US soil?
|
And I've shown that the president has done so WITHOUT such language in situations in the past.
so the rhetoric doesn't matter.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|