|
otto---it is of no consequence to me whether you imagine there to be "liberal talking points" or not or whether, more surreal still, you imagine me to either be a "liberal" (i understand myself to be well to the left of the democratic party) or that i would repeat such talking point, if they existed.
what's more interesting in this particular case is that you really have no idea what you're talking about, and that you have no idea what william ayers has done, what he stands for, who he is. your understanding of it extends about as deep as the surface of your television screen. it's kinda amazing that you would accept the campaign's redbaiting and repeat it as if there was anything of interest in it, without doing the slightest bit of research independently, without having the faintest idea, seemingly, not only of what that talking point refers to or is saying. but you project all that onto me.
then when confronted with a bit of information which even a rudimentary search could have provided you, you shuck and jive.
this is the best you got to bring?
as a conservative, you don't consider it important to be able to represent the political positions you hold with any logic or explanation? you don't feel any particular need to inform yourself about what the points you bring up actually are?
how does that work?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|