Why do you say it is "ridiculous"? They are just asking for the state to respect their religious views and use an alternative form of ID. Not a worse one, just an alternative one.
Why should the believer have to bend for the state - and never drive - and not the state bend for the believer?
If there was a religion that forbade its followrs to be photographed, would you be happy with the fact that a whole religious group would be essentially banned from driving simply because the goverment can't be bothered to be a bit flexible in what forms of ID it recognised?
Its a driving licence for goodness sake. All it does is say "this person passed a driving test". Its not as if the fate of the nation is at stake here.
__________________
I've been 4thTimeLucky, you've been great. Goodnight and God bless!
|