|
will, not sure how well versed you are in the shiite/sunni doctrines and how compatible they really are.
they are chalk and cheese. you cant fathom how far away in the spectrum they are from each other. this is especially the case with the saudi wahhabi government and the shiite iranians. if there was a comparison between the two i would haveto say it would be similar to the protestant and catholics in northern ireland. except it would be a lot worse if these guys lived inthe same country.
the only reason that iran would 'take over' any part of iraq is if the shiite majority let it. and even at that, you would be hard pressed to find places like Fallujah submitting to the whims of the iranians anytime soon.
i dont think any country should be 'let go'. some sort league needs to be set up to liase with the west. led by someone that can take the iranians under their wing. possibly a western friendly nation, a non arab like iran - the turks. a country with enough cleat and power in the world, a country fairly large that isnt dwarfed by irans size.
but you are right about the saudis - they are more stable as they are. theres a lot of people in the arab world that would like to see the back of them sooner rather than later.
__________________
An injustice anywhere, is an injustice everywhere
I always sign my facebook comments with ()()===========(}. Does that make me gay?
- Filthy
|