Quote:
Originally Posted by percy
The Las Vegas thing. I think it got blown out of proportion. I don't know if he knew an accomplice of his hand a gun, but even if he did, I don't think it warrants a possible 30 year prison sentence. People wave guns around when they get cut off in traffic and even if charged, probably doesn't come close to what OJ may receive.
I think the cops are out to get him and he is dumb enough to bait them.
As far as his murder trial. I don't know if he did or did not kill his wife. If I were a jury though I would have acquitted him since the evidence did not stand up for me.(Either real evidence or tainted evidence to frame him)
And I don't think he is smart enough to get away with murder
|
I don't know. I always thought he did the murders, but he was found not guilty... so he's not guilty of them. Doesn't mean he didn't do them. I figured he and his white Bronco driving buddy (AJ?) killed the pair. Do I know that? Absolutely not. I followed the trial a little, but due to work and having an life can't say I watched it from start to finish. So if I was on the jury I have no idea how I'd have voted. My impression of the event is clouded by a mix of the trial and news reports.
Do I think the cops are out to get him? Sure some of them. He's tainted. He should have avoided even the appearance of being involved with anything slightly illegal.
As for the Vegas thing being blown out of proportion- ever see the movie Alpha Dog? It's based on a true story. One guy owns another guy for some smoke. The guy owed has the other guys brother kidnapped, things go bad and the brother end up full of bullets. Small things become big things quickly when firearms are involved. As such laws deal with crimes involving firearms more seriously then those without.