Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
That suggests that there are people who do. When I look back over the past 8 years with Chaney, it seems to me that he took Democratic party leaders by surprise, even though he wrote the book on executive power. Chaney pretty much did what he wanted, concentrated more power in the WH, gave Congress a big "FU", and got away with it.
|
and this makes it ok?? That is dangerous. The VP is not there for legislative power except in the event of a tie vote.. he clearly did not understand this role and neither does your psuedo-little miss maverick.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ace
So, when he leaves all will be o.k. Bush was the reason Congress voted to go to war. Bush was the reason Congress authorized the spending that lead to deficits. Bush wrote the legislation that let Fannie and Freddie go under. Etc.Etc.Etc.
|
It's no secret to anyone that Bush economic policies have led us down the wrong path. Will it be fixed the day he leaves? Hardy har har.. of course not.. however, since afaik, Obama is using a lot of Clinton's economic advisers and that.. is a good thing to get us on the right track.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ace
Nothing. But it seems you don't get the point. We will withdraw with victory, on our terms, when we want based on conditions. Artificial timeframes fail to recognize the complexities of war.
|
so basically.. it's our country now. Fuck the Iraqi people and their government.. wait.. I thought we were over there to "free" and give them independence and democracy?? So.. now we have them trained and a government set up.. but let's just fuck them in the ass some more.. yeah that makes a lot of sense
Obama has set a time frame for withdrawl.. however, I'm quite positive that if a situation did arise, the time frame could be restructured. It's not a hard concept to grasp.. unless your Sarah Palin or John McCain.