Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
In the first election in 1789, G. Washington received 100% of the popular vote (he basically ran unopposed) and Adams was the presumptive VP nominee ....yet John Jay, John Hancock, George Clnton and others all received electoral votes.
I wonder how many of those Jay/Hancock/Clinton electoral votes were FOR them or AGAINST Washinton/Adams coalition...some were Federalist, some were anti_Federalist.
There have always been and always will be "protest" votes, but IMO you are making it out to be a bigger issue than I believe it is. Where is ANY data (not polls on discussion boards) that it is greater this year than int he past?
Its probably about 1 out of 5 nationwide this year and I just dont find that so surprising and probably not that different from most recent presidential elections.
But...we see what we want to see.
|
I never said it was different than any other( we see what we want?)
I am saying it's the same old shit....
Quote:
I'm lost how does 16% win an election?
|
Tully, 16% can sway a vote result, not win it...even I know that. Hence, the word "margin"...