|
Cadre: It's actually NOT a wiki, which is what makes it WORSE. Wikipedia, despite being a wiki, is one of the foremost sites in the world for accurate information (especially on important or obscure topics). The important topics are absolutely impossible to vandalize with tens of thousands of watchdogs on the prowl at any time of day, and the obscure topics (like medical information and whathaveyou) just aren't likely to be vandalized (they're more likely to be noticed wrong by an expert and corrected). It's not perfect (there are some vandals who are very sneaky) but it's surpassed anyone's expectations of accuracy.
The BAD thing about Conservapedia is that you must register for an account. They keep tabs on everyone to make sure they're not adding any 'liberal propaganda' to their site. Wikipedia may have a -slight- liberal bias, but Conservapedia's bias is so far to the right it's not even funny.
@Martian: They had plenty of sources cited. I just can't tell the difference between a peer-reviewed study and one they ran their own.
|