Quote:
Originally Posted by guccilvr
For the sake of argument..there's plenty of defamation on both sides of the fence. They could simply argue that it's a statement of beliefs which is protected as long as it doesn't rise to the level of hate speech.
|
You wouldn't call essentially blaming Charles Darwin for the holocaust hate speech? I can't imagine a worse way to offend truth. Charles Dawrin managed to answer one of the fundamental questions of man—where did we come from?—and because it offends some very ignorant people they're trying to associate him with one of the worst crimes in the history of our species. I mean holy crap.
I'm not talking actual castration, but the place is evil from my perspective. Nothing on it even attempts at being correct. It is the most pure form of intellectual dishonesty that I've ever come across.
There are some things that shouldn't be tolerated, which is why we have laws. We don't tolerate murder, theft, rape, and more extreme forms of lying. Defamation is illegal for a reason.