|
If we can't agree that the official story is not the most likely explanation for any of the evidence, there's no use talking about any conspiracy theories at all because they'll be assumed by one side and dismissed by the other. In effect, my method is your method: building a common frame of reference by addressing the question one piece of evidence at a time. Once there's enough evidence that people generally agree that the official story isn't the most likely explanation, then the thread has done what I intended. Likewise, if the opposite has happened, where most of the evidence is thoroughly studied by each side and the consensus is that the evidence does support the official story, we can share this information with other people that don't believe the official story.
The end result should be truth either way, after all.
|