|
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
or it could be that you are trying to pose a general problem through an very bad example.
everyone does it from time to time, but not everyone then refuses to recognize the problems that are caused for the entire discussion by your poorly chosen, badly framed example and then compounds this by acting instead like the responses you are getting say something entirely alien to what anyone who rejects your premise is actually saying.
if you want to argue for "responsibility" maybe you should start with taking some for the problems with your own arguments.
|
really? a few people do understand what I'm talking about, so it's not as far flung as you're characterizing.
I've tried to get more understanding but people flat out have stated you don't get it, I'm not explaining it to you. Great! Good communication for discussion there!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
I'll try one more time.
Cyn...as I understand your reasoning, you are suggesting that the fiscal decisionmaking process is or should be same, regardless of whether the program in question is rape kits, trash collection, pot hole repair or summer parks programs.
I simply disagree.
|
Closest you've come.
I'm not making it as clear cut as same program for program, service for service regardless since obviously some programs and services outweigh others, but in the absence of inability to communicate, I've had to pare it down to that point.
And, your answer is just that you disagree, novel really, maybe even quaint.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|