Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
I don't think you actually get it.
Nobody here think that government has unlimited money, or that rape kits are free. I think what most people find facile is your insistence that your "Who's gonna pay for these rape kits?" is actually useful in the context of any sort of meaningful discussion on fiscal responsibility. Believe it or not, there are some things that people find more important than rigid adherence to specific accounting philosophies.
Who's gonna pay for it? Not the rape victim. Beyond that it doesn't fucking matter.
|
see again, shortsighted. I didn't limit it to RAPEKITS. but you read what you want and then interepret it as you see fit without the rest of the words surround it.
I get it. You, rb, and dc aren't interested in how the fiscal operations work. It's just a GIVEN that it should be collected and spent.
right, they don't adhere to ANY accounting philosophies or responsibility, which is why the feds have huge deficit spending, state and local governments have shortfalls to FY09 budgets calling for further expenditure cutss, personal credit has topped out, home equity was used as an ATM, am I missing something where money hasn't been squeezed out?
but I've been saying all this time,"someone needs to pay for the rapekits... it's raaaape... rapekits... need to pay for them!" 
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|