Interesting take. I hadn't thought of it like that.
The most common alternate to the official story is that of an intentional collapse. Using some method, some individual or individuals intentionally caused the collapse of the towers. This would explain WTC7 being the first steel framed building in history to fall (supposedly) due to fire, it would explain falling into it's own footprint despite apparent asymmetrical distribution of fires, it would explain how only small fires were witnessed, and it would explain the reports of explosions. Unfortunately, it begs some rather frightening questions, and that's when things generally get way, way off track in a thread like this. Someone says "controlled demolition", someone else asks "why?", they try to guess, but then the whole issue moves away from facts and gets so deep into speculation that it can become silly. I'm pretty sure aliens aren't responsible for 9/11, for example.
|