View Single Post
Old 09-22-2008, 06:12 PM   #13 (permalink)
The_Dunedan
Junkie
 
Quote:
According to a WWII pilot the P51 (standard) was the first plane to break the "sound barrier", in attack dive. They just didn't know at the time what was happening.
I've heard this story before, and according to Chuck Yeager it was even around back in the 1950s. However, I have never heard anything to make me believe it's credible. The reasons are several:

1: As an aircraft approaches the speed of sound, turbulence caused by the buildup of air in front of the airplane causes the airplane to shake. A LOT. This was the primary difficulty encountered by teams attempting to break the Sound Barrier; the planes kept disintegrating. Britain lost their best test-pilot when his tailless Swallow came apart in a dive at around .93 Mach. The P-51 wasn't engineered to deal with these kinds of stresses, and both Chuck Yeager and Bud Anderson state in Yeager's autobiography that numerous P-51s were mysteriously destroyed as they approached .90 Mach, usually while diving after German fighters.

2: The P-51 lacks the horsepower for this. Its' top speed was less than 500mph, and even a full-power zero-lift dive won't add 250+mph to an airplane's top speed. Even going straight down, reaching any speed greater than terminal velocity (220-ish mph max) is all horsepower. The Merlin was a helluvan engine, but it just didn't have the juice. Even the early jets, which had several hundred horsepower per tonne more power than the Mustang, were subsonic.

3: The P-51's wings are -dead- wrong for supersonic flight. In order to deflect and (somewhat) decompress the pressure wave which builds in front of the airplane at high speeds (see #1) you need either swept wings (like almost everything supersonic) or veeeeeeeeeeery thin, short, straight wings (like the X1/2 or F-104 Starfighter). The thin straight wings only work on long, thin aircraft, and not very well at that. The P-51s wings are thick, straight, and basically the worst-possible configuration for supersonic flight. So much bearing surface with so little aft reinforcement would probably cause the transsonic pressure-wave to rip the wings off before you got near 1.0 Mach, which is pretty much what Yeager, Anderson, and other pilots describe happening. This goes triple for the tail surfaces, which are under even more severe stresses thanks to the turbulence coming off the wings.



As for the OP, neat pics!
The_Dunedan is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360