|
Rekna, look at what you're saying: people outside the govt shouldnt' be able to seek to have the laws enforced in the way they prefer. By that standard, every advocacy group would be shut out of seeking govt instrumentalities to further their own goals. Heck, it would be the end of community organizing. To say nothing of violating the First Amendment freedom of petition.
Methinks you're proposing rules that have short-term benefits for the political side you prefer but which if, if you thought what they would mean if applied in a consistent way, you'd see would ultimately restrict people's liberty and ultimately lead to bad results. Or you can keep adding more and more rules (which means, always, more and more loopholes), then more rules to close off the new loopholes, followed by yet more rules. And so it goes. That's what happens when you try to tilt the playing field by government fiat.
|