Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
otto...do you really think its honest for any politician to keep inferring that there was some connection between 9/11 and Iraq?
With Cheney, at least we know its a clear case of attempting to manipulate the facts and perpetuate a falsehood for political purposes.
With Palin, we dont know if that is the case of if she is simply ignorant of the facts.
We do know that on several occasions,McCain seemed to have a hard time being able to distinguish between Shiia and Sunni.
IMO, neither Paln's intentional or ignorant 9/11-Iraq reference nor McCain's Shiia-Sunni confusion inspires alot of confidence.
|
I believe my comment was in response to host's assertion that Palin is Cheny. Sort of transferring his hatred for Bush to the next possible surrogate. Makes sense in a clinical way.
and speaking of clinical...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
ace, I've stopped engaging you for the most part, because your citations are regularly so "over the top"  |
Regarding your question... Do you think it's honest to grossly over-simplify the complexities of association, cause, and effect regarding the ever-shifting multi-interests of aligned and non-aligned Islamic militant movements?
Which 9/11 Iraq reference are you
referring... in host's post, news articles, the 20/20 interview?