|
couldn't disagreement simply follow from the fact of an assertion rather than from it's content?
i don't see how the contrary can be argued, really, that it follows from the fact of a differend that the question around which it unfolds therefore has a kind of "objective" content.
except to the extent that it exists as a question posed, as an act.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|