Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
There is a difference between "more affordable" and simply "affordable," the latter implying that college may not be a possibility without financial aid.
What is Obama's plan for financial aid assistance?
If it weren't for financial aid, there's a good chance I'd have only a high-school education.
Are we to talk about the cost of education here or the accessibility to it?
|
What's wrong with loans? State schools are another cheap alternative too.
-----Added 10/9/2008 at 12 : 38 : 21-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
But what happens when a person faces a bill for $100,000 for a four year degree, gets $50,000 in aid and before they graduate the cost ends up being $150,000? It seem like a shell game to me.
I think he wants to simplify the process and give tax credits.
Or, you would have found an alternative. Perhaps, some people would actually get more out of college after spending a few years working full time and saving before entering.
Also, the point is to look at the real costs. And we should ask the question why are the costs of higher education consistently exceeding the national inflation rate. why do you think this is happening?
I think the two issues are connected. I think if classroom capacity was increased, costs could be driven down. Giving more access and lowering the cost. I think this can be done while maintaining the quality of the degrees.
|
The problem is you cheapen education really. As it is, college degrees in the US are diluted. It's not worth much these days. You have to have a Master's to be competitive unless you have a useful degree in a hard science or accounting/business/finance.
__________________
"The race is not always to the swift, nor battle to the strong, but
to the one that endures to the end."
"Demand more from yourself, more than anyone else could ever ask!"
- My recruiter
Last edited by jorgelito; 09-10-2008 at 08:38 AM..
Reason: Automerged Doublepost
|