|
Monogamy: it's in the genes
Saw this article today and thought it was fascinating (even though the study was limited to men--I'd like to see it extended to include women, of course)... basically, it says that there may be gene variants that account for different levels of "commitment" among men, which they study by asking people about their marital happiness, discord, etc in the past year... and looking at their genes to see if they have certain alleles. This would explain a lot!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seattle Times
Not the marrying kind? It may be a gene thing click to show
By Shankar Vedantam
The Washington Post
Men are more likely to be devoted and loyal husbands when they lack a particular variant of a gene that influences brain activity, researchers said, the first time science has shown a direct link between a man's genes and his aptitude for monogamy.
The finding is striking because it links the gene variant — which is present in two of every five men — with the risk of marital discord and divorce, and appears to predict whether women involved with these men are likely to say their partners are emotionally close and available or distant and disagreeable.
The presence of the gene variant, or allele, also seems predictive of whether men get married or live with women without getting married.
"Men with two copies of the allele had twice the risk of experiencing marital dysfunction, with a threat of divorce during the last year, compared to men carrying one or no copies," said Hasse Walum, a behavioral geneticist at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, who led the study, released Monday.
"Women married to men with one or two copies of the allele scored lower on average on how satisfied they were with the relationship compared to women married to men with no copies."
Test for marriage prospects?
The scientists studied men because the hormone being examined is known to play a larger role in their brains than in women's brains.
The finding set off a debate about whether people should conduct genetic tests to find out whether potential mates are bad-marriage prospects. Several independent scientists called the discovery remarkable and elegant but disagreed over whether such information ought to be used in making personal decisions about love and marriage.
Walum said the presence of the allele increased the risk of conjugal discord, but many other factors probably shape marital behavior. But he and other scientists said the study is the latest piece of evidence to show that biology — down to the level of individual genes — can play a powerful role in shaping complex human behavior.
In other words, if a man's culture, religion and family background each have a seat at the conference table that determines his attitudes toward marital fidelity and monogamy, his genes might well sit at the head of the table.
"There are many ways this information can help a man and his wife when they marry," said Helen Fisher, a biological anthropologist at Rutgers University who studies romantic love. "Knowing there are biological weak links can help you overcome them."
A man who knows he has this allele, she added, might be able to use the knowledge to ignore tugs of restlessness he might feel in his marriage: "You can say, 'Oh, it is just my DNA, and I am going to ignore it.' "
The allele that Walum and a team of scientists studied in a sample of more than 1,000 heterosexual couples regulates the activity of a hormone in the brain known as vasopressin. It dictates how and where vasopressin receptors are situated in the brain.
Effectively, said Larry Young, a psychiatrist who studies the genetics of social behavior at Emory University, brain receptors act like locks, and vasopressin acts like a key. The key works only when there is a lock; in the absence of a receptor, vasopressin cannot act.
Marital discord
About 40 percent of men have one or two copies of the allele. Walum, a doctoral student, said that men with two copies of the allele had a greater risk of marital discord than men with one copy, and that men with one copy of the allele were at more risk of such discord than men with no copies.
The study asked men in married or long-term relationships whether they had experienced relationship crises in the past year that were of such intensity that they considered divorce or splitting.
The scientists also asked the wives and partners of the men what it was like to live with them, examining levels of affection, cohesion, consensus and satisfaction.
The study was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
All the scientists emphasized that more work needs to be done to replicate the finding and to explore possible interactions between multiple genes and environmental factors.
"What this means is that some people will go into marriage with a stronger deck of cards," Fisher said.
Fisher said she would not reject a potential mate who has two copies of the risky allele. She paused, and added, "But I might not start a joint bank account with them for the first few years."
Washington Post staff writer Rob Stein contributed to this report.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
Nation & World | Not the marrying kind? It may be a gene thing | Seattle Times Newspaper
|
What do you guys think? I tend to think that there are "marrying" types, and conversely, those who are not... even though most people get married anyway, this might help account for the 50% divorce rate. You might call it genetic incompatibility... not with your partner, but with the ability to stay committed, in itself. Evolutionarily, perhaps in the past it was more beneficial to NOT be committed, so that you could spread your seed more often... but these days, seems to be the committed types to prosper more. Thoughts?
__________________
And think not you can direct the course of Love;
for Love, if it finds you worthy, directs your course.
--Khalil Gibran
|