Okay...I'm just wanting to get at whether the dynamic changes once a woman is in a relationship. And I understand that it does.
What I don't understand is what makes it alright when she is not in a relationship. Why we would want to give the idea to
anyone that it is alright.
In the main story of the article, I don't get the impression that the trip to the rain forest was a direct exchange...rather the sex was a consequence. I think her story is a reach, an attempt to make an issue out of something more mundane. And, in fact, a patriarchal attempt to alarm people. Which is being used to spur a debate that is quite different from that being posed in the story...I take exception to it.
