View Single Post
Old 08-24-2008, 06:55 AM   #13 (permalink)
yellowmac
Insane
 
yellowmac's Avatar
 
Location: left coast
Quote:
Originally Posted by highthief View Post
I see what you are saying but given how people like Spitz and Thorpe have done similar things, so what Phelps has done - while remarkable - isn't really surprising. Had he not achieved 8 medals, it actually might have been more of a shock.

Also, many, many WR were broken in the pool due to the technology of both the pool and the suits, and many racers got close to Phelps.

What Bolt has done is utterly unprecedented. Only Jesse Owens has similar achievements to his name (prior to the Berlin Olympics he set 3 or 4 world records in one day) but to be fair, track was not as competitive then as it is today. No one got close to Bolt - he utterly destroyed the fields, and in the 100, without seemingly trying very hard. The scale of this achievement is fantastic. 3 WR in the same games is off the charts in the modern era and worldwide, more people care about this than Phelps.

I would venture to say that had Bolt been American we would not be having this conversation, such would the media saturation by NBC, etc be.
On your last point there, I'll admit that media saturation of Phelps likely has given me an implicit bias. The only thing that would be different had Bolt been American is that this debate between Bolt and Phelps would be occurring in the mainstream media as well.

On the technology point, I've actually been wondering about this myself. Yes, a lot of people wore those Speedo LZR magic suits that helped break records... how much technological innovation has taken place on the track? Clearly there hasn't been a wardrobe change, so what else has taken place? Better shoes? Better track? I heard one of the commentators say something about Beijing having a "fast track"... what does that mean? Bouncier rubber in the tracks or something? I guess what I'm wondering is how much of the evolution in the world record time is from technology, and how much is it from sheer human physiological evolution?

Also, I counter your Spitz and Thorpe argument with the fact that Carl Lewis in '84 did similar things, winning the 100, 200, 4x100, and the long jump, to boot.

Interesting debate. I do hope that Phelps and Bolt have restored the luster of the Olympics globally. They've done the job for me personally, as I found '08 to be much more captivating than '04 or '00.
yellowmac is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360