yes. That's a single incident from almost 40 years ago, misreported and passed on as a demonstration of something. It was a flawed mechanistic and shallow way to attempt to demonstrate something as subtle as human suggestibility in the first place.
To use this as a proof of anything isn't good research or documentation technique and is not even on the scale of rigorousness.
The fact is, humans are thoroughly suggestible and manipulable.
The fact is that billions of dollars of research produces advertising and messaging that influences us in subliminal ways.
__________________
create evolution
|