Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Willravel
Thanks, but I'm convinced that they won't be taken for their meaning and have the underlying point ignored.
|
And just after I posted this, DK responded and didn't pay any attention to the underlying points, and even was outright wrong in his responses:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
this is example is sheer stupidity. Do you not realize that this infringes on the rights of the victim? The freedom of religion does not excuse murder and you know this. A completely ridiculous example.
|
You throw around words like stupid and ridiculous not understanding their proper use. I find that ironic. The rights of the victim are not made clear in the BOR and as such are overridden assuming that the rights in the BOR are absolute.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
another idiotic example. The second amendment does not allow one to commit crimes of violence nor would the perpetrator been allowed to keep his weapon because he was in custody. Another completely ridiculous example
|
The second amendment, taken absolutely, states that the government cannot take a weapon from a citizen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
has absolutely nothing to do with the 3rd Amendment. You are reaching incredible heights of moronic examples in your attempt to counter my very credible arguments.
|
If you'd like to support your claim that the hypothetical case I presented has absolutely nothing to do with the Third Amendment, you are free to do so. All I see is a conclusion without any support.
I'll let you know when you make a credible argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
Please do, as I'm finding them amusing.
|
I'm sure you would if you understood them.
-----Added 10/8/2008 at 06 : 49 : 58-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
that means there's no basis for a discussion here at all.
|
There never was. Still, it's Sunday afternoon and my West Wing Season 2 DVD isn't keeping my full attention.