I only have a few thoughts. First off, the thread title is a slippery slope fallacy:
Quote:
|
When 'rights' are 'reasonably restricted', you begin to lose them eventually.
|
That's simply not true. Most if not all rights have had reasonable restrictions from day one, and today many still remain in place. It *can* lead to a loss, but not necessarily. To make such a statement is a gross oversimplification and massive exaggeration. It's also black and white thinking. Either a right is total and absolute (which is a theoretical state) or there is no right?
Also, I believe we already have a thread about "free speech zones".