View Single Post
Old 08-05-2008, 10:08 AM   #8 (permalink)
Lewis
Artist and author
 
Lewis's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
It's a fascinating question, and the rich and various replies here show me that there is no real answer to this. I usually find that conversations on this subject inevitably lead nowhere, as the ground rules are not set first. The biggest one, of course, is the definition of art itself, which has shifted and changed with the times and is interpreted in different ways by just about everyone. Much of what was produced in the past and is we call art now, was not produced with 'artistic intentions' what ever they are, and particularly in early times were necessary elements of spiritual existence. When I lived in Canada, for instance, I was amazed by the sophisticated new masks and stuff being produced by First Nations people, not for their original purpose, but purely for profit achieved by selling them to the people who could be regarded as those who screwed their culture in the first place.

So, to be brave, my feeling is that art is a combination of observation, interpretation, manipulation and presentation. I feel that it is important to shock, or at least make people think. Art has always been a powerful voice for social change, and a barometer on society. There is nothing wrong with what I call 'wall accessories', but they don't excite me, and usually those that I have owned very soon blend into the furniture. However, for me the original post made me think about the only boundary that I can think of.

If you purposely allow a dog to starve to death and then present this as art, I don't think it is. It is abuse, plain and simple, and it is more about the artist than what he or she is producing. Compare this with what Hitler was doing in his time. He wanted to produce the perfect race and get rid of those that he regarded as imperfect. His work of art, if he had achieved it. But to me, if the production of 'art' involved taking sentient life, then it is criminal abuse, and nothing to do with art. Ironically, the reporting of such an act, could be art, as were Any Warhol's Electric Chairs.

I do admire the traditional oriental way of interfacing with art, as I understand it. It is not to make judgments and rant and rail about what offends or challenges, but to observe and see what, if any, impact it has on you. After all, our reactions often say more about ourselves than they do about the subject in question, and that can be very useful information.
Lewis is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360