Quote:
|
Seaver, why would you play DaOC if it sucked for the first 49 levels just to enjoy the end-game? I would say WoWs strongest point is the 1-69 game.
|
I joined after seeing how much fun the endgame of DAoC was. WoW was ONLY fun during the 1-59 level, at 60 they had nothing to offer. Even when PvP was released it was horrid, the classes were designed for PvE and in no way resembled PvP balance. DAoC had only mediocre stuff 1-49, and at 50 it was amazing. It had some balance issues, to which no one will lie. However playing WAR the classes seem very well balanced and reflect the focus on RvR.
Quote:
|
They copy/pasted the basic elements of WoW(poorly), and the only real difference will be the rvr stuff.
|
Have you tried the Public Quests? Have you tried RvR? Be honest and tell us how long you played the game? If you play it for under 20 levels you can't pass judgement as you won't find a single MMO which gets good before then.
I remember reading the same stuff regarding WoW from EQ'ers. WoW was not revolutionary, and neither is WAR. Honestly, nothing in MMO's have been revolutionary since UO. You say you're nitpicky, I say you're going in with pre-conceived notions. The similarities between the WoW and WAR universe immediately give credence to those who say it's a copy/paste. It looks very similar because Warcraft was designed around Warhammer (couldn't get the rights).
I'm not saying it's the second coming, but I'm sold on it, and all of our old DAoC guild have had a blast with the RvR. I