|
And yet you reject the very notion of annual exams based on the minority of incidental data.
Had she chosen to write a book about the strides and advancements in women's health would you then accept or reject the data used?
The point is we accept what we want to accept, and when it's a negative toward an issue, we embrace it more. But negative connotations, especially as they pertain to our own personal well being, hurts no one but our own selves.
While you choose to be anti-progression and vigilant in pointing out the "horror stories", which are far outnumbered byt the advances, I choose to be pro and vigilant in my assurances that I am getting the best I can find.
In my over half a century on this planet, I have yet to be "sexually violated", the victim of poor medical decisions or taken advantage of because of my status as a female.
|