View Single Post
Old 07-28-2008, 08:10 AM   #40 (permalink)
Baraka_Guru
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by robot_parade View Post
For instance:

Executive Pay: CEO Pay Up 298%, Average Worker's? 4.3% (1995-2005)

So, if that article is correct, since 1990, corporate profits have doubled, CEO pay is up about 300%, and the average worker is making...4.3% more.

Why?
Profits are up maybe because of CEO decisions that both save money and increase revenues.

But in regards to the average worker, a 4.3% increase is more than double the average annual rate of inflation for that same period, so workers are generally better off. I doubt you could have increased worker pay by as much as 300% and still maintain profitability. Even something like 5% or 6% would be unsustainable. Worker cost is generally a high one as an overall percentage of business costs.

I know it doesn't sound fair, but I will repeat what I said in my previous post: This is more market-based than based on "fairness," whatever that is.

EDIT: I just realized that this is a "cumulative" increase, which means inflation has eroded worker earnings by as much as 16% to 18% over the period. Okay, well, that sucks. Fine. But I still say this is market-based. I blame globalization.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 07-28-2008 at 08:16 AM..
Baraka_Guru is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52