|
Until recently, the 2nd Ammendment called for a "well regulated militia". Our Supreme Court could not (or would not) define that - so they dropped it and said that you have a right to defend yourself w/a gun.
I have no problem w/that. My problem is this - why is it the 2nd Ammendment must include the "right" to own any weapon of your choice, with no regulation?
No disrespect to the ruling, but just because I've never fallen under one of the categories listed not to have a weapon, does that automatactily give me the right to stockpile AK-47s? RPGs?
|