View Single Post
Old 06-19-2008, 07:45 PM   #103 (permalink)
Sion
Dumb all over...a little ugly on the side
 
Sion's Avatar
 
Location: In the room where the giant fire puffer works, and the torture never stops.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
I appreciate that, but I'd like to see the follow up investigations into these complaints before I assume that they are symptomatic of anything but phantom problems.

And I'd point out that if you are making ANY kind of assumptions without detailed knowledge of the specifics of the case, then you are not being very scientific. (light-hearted jab)


Ok, several other things that have come to mind:

with regard to the hard vs soft nature of certain branches of science: perhaps a better terminology would be accuracy and/or precision. the "hard" sciences have, over hundreds or even thousands of years, developed a vary high level of precision. the "soft" sciences, because they are still in their infancy, so to speak, do not yet have that same level of precision.

examples: engineering, particularly civil and mechanical, has been studied and practiced for literally thousands of years. social/behavioral sciences, like psychology and psychiatry, have been studied and practiced for maybe a hundred fifty years or so. even medical science has only been studied in a scientific manner for a few hundred years.

as a result of this huge age difference in these various disciplines, there is, naturally, a huge difference in the level of precision that has been attained therein. as was pointed out earlier, there are few, if any, unknown variables in the construction of a building. on the other hand, treating depression (or any other psychiatric/psychologic illnesses) is still somewhat of a guessing game (albeit an educated guess) due to the fact that there are so many unknowns when it come to the mind and brain. this is not a criticism of psychology and the social sciences, but rather a simple statement of (and I hope you'll pardon the use of the term) fact.

of course, there are some who might say that the social sciences will never reach the same level of precision, due to the inherent unpredictability of the human species. the question here is: do we simply not know enough about ourselves to predict human behavior to the same level of precision that we can in predicting how a building will stand up to wind/rain/earthquakes/etc, or are humans simply and inherently unpredictable? I tend to think that there is a certain level of unpredictability to humanity that no science will ever be able overcome.
__________________
He's the best, of course, of all the worst.
Some wrong been done, he done it first. -fz

I jus' want ta thank you...falettinme...be mice elf...agin...
Sion is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360