Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
No. You haven't effectively described why they are pornography. I think the burden lies with you. I can say they are not porn because I don't find that they promote the children in a sexual way. I would like to hear why seeing a child nude is unequivocally erotic.
|
QFT
What was the definition I heard from the US Supreme Court? Pornography is any act which causes sexual thought without artistic merit. (?)
So, it follows that if the images are said to be pornographic, then they must cause sexual thought in the judge.
I don't find these images causing me sexual thoughts.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
|