Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian
I'm conflicted on this. On the one hand, I can certainly see the merit in it, which I don't think needs to be explained.
On the other hand, I see mandating something like belt size as setting a dangerous precedent.
|
I'll admit I thought this, too, but I couldn't formulate an argument that wasn't a slippery slope to support the thought. Think of it: why are they doing this? Driving down healthcare cost. What could be done, besides promoting good health, that would be so bad based on the precedence set by this legislation?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian
For the record, I'm well under the proposed limit; the 32" jeans I'm wearing while typing this are a bit loose on me.
|
And if they regulate your fedora size?