Baraka,
DRM isn't material; Nor is copyright material. They are legal jargon, words on paper or spoken. Material crime is far more intimate with most people. Violent crime, robbery/theft, embezzlement, etc. Trying to crossover a law based on non-material objects into the material doesn't work. To me, that means the laws don't make sense. Am I not explaining this well?
The point is that, a) it's not terribly enforceable as there is limited evidence left behind during most "crimes" regarding DRM.
b) The rules are sticky and not well explained. Actually, with software you usually CANNOT have as many copies as you want on devices you own. Many pieces of software allow ONE install on ONE system (windows is the best example, but there are others). And you can almost never copy the disc, by way of the EULA.
c) It's the marriage of everything, DRM, copy protection and EULA that makes it a nightmare for legit end-users. I'd bet that many end-users, simply out of lack of understanding, violate the EULA more often than not.
At any rate, the defense against Willravel's comment is akin to this... If you COPY your gaming disc, using something that defeats the copy protection, you are in violation of the law (DMCA, I believe... at least). I don't want to hear about "making piracy easier"... I want to hear about "Not being assholes to your end-users".