Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
No, ace.....IMO, based on the above....you clearly dont understand the intended role of Congressional oversight and are searching for ways to continue to discredit or minimize the value of the oversight conducted in the last year+ by the Democrats.
|
Not very helpful. Perhaps you can explain what it is I don't understand.
Quote:
You are attempting to inject the issue of campaign connections of a candidate/supporter with some nebulous suggestion that it is somehow an active Executive Branch function worthy of Congressional oversight.
|
I can have more than one line of thought. Sure I have questions about Obama, but I also have questions about Congressional oversight. Also, I tend to move on. If one set of questions go unanswered and I ask new questions, it does not unnecessarily follow that all of the questions were related. I have found that generally, questions are simply food for thought because they mostly go unanswered. I get the feeling based on your comment on "baiting", that there is a fear that answering a question could lead to something - what I don't know. But, I do understand. Questions can be uncomfortable.
Quote:
I understand why you want to do this, but your rationalization just doesnt fly in a discussion about Congressional oversight.
|
I don't think you do.
Quote:
If you want to have a discussion about the valid topic of candidates vetting their supporters/contributors/advisors, I would suggest a new thread.
|
No need. I know what I need to know.