View Single Post
Old 06-11-2008, 07:22 AM   #212 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
no will, a phantom since you are talking about future bush wannabees. That's no different than saying "I'm worried that brown people will bomb and terrorize us." You are just fearful of a future bush wannabee.
Many presidents have abused their position. Pretending it's unlikely in the future is naive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
Demand impeachment. Great! Now what? Demand it again?
Demand it for every criminal/president. That's like saying "Arrest a criminal. Great! Now what? Arrest another?".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
Bush will continue to be as you put it the worst president in history until the Jan 20, 2009. If you believe that it's going to change before then. Great! You are a true believer in the checks and balances of the system. You believe the the possiblity that he may be impeached before the end of his term is possible. It just may be.
I have no illusions. At this point (assuming it does take 10 months), it may not prevent him from doing anything, but it will punish him for what he has done and act as a deterrent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
I'm not disagreeing will. I'm in agreement that there needs to always be checks and balances. IMO the best checks and balances are when the powers are not encroached upon and if one branch is out of line the other is at the ready to check it.

What I'm in disagreement with is that I don't want the Congress to sit concentrating all it's efforts on punishing Bush. IMO it won't help reduce the price of gasoline, reduce the cost of my breakfast consisting of eggs, bacon, orange juice, and toast. No, I'm more concerned that my money isn't buying me as much as it used to. I can no longer enjoy going to Europe without worrying about the extra costs as my coffee in the morning costs me more on Saturday than it did on Tuesday.
The independent counsel investigation would take time. The House Judiciary Committee would not even necessarily investigate (they didn't for Clinton), and the vote wouldn't take long at all. The Senate would have a trial that would take maybe a month and then they would vote.
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360