i dont get this objection either---the problem is the "green movement" and not the production processes/commodities that generate these side-effects? so this "green movement" is an affliction--perhaps it is better that no consequences are labelled, no side-effects--because that way...well what? there won't be any side-effects or consequences? you as a consumer will feel less burdened with information when you make a commodity choice? the persecution "green movement" (in your imagination perhaps) will be defeated?
i dont see the logic at all.
but maybe i am misinterpreting the syntax.
who knows?
who the hell knows?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|