Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
There is a three way checks and balances...each have their role...Congress makes the law, the AG enforces the law, the Judiciary interprets the law.
As to Clinton, do you have specific examples of how the AG served the interest of Clinton as opposed to enforcing the law or acting in the interest of the county?
|
Got it, that's much more plain english. So the AG did not wish to enforce the law, but couldn't some other attorney do so as well? or is the AG above all attorneys like a commander and chief?
No I don't it was a question more than statement. I seem to recall the same politics during the Clinton impeachment where the AG didn't want to turn over documents or something along those lines.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|