I looked at all of the photos. Like MM, I was put off by how 'studio' they looked. I don't consider those art, but that's my opinion. I don't consider them porn either, although there are always going to be sick people getting off on these types of photos. C'est la vie.
I wasn't going to post on this topic because it's subjective and a moral call. However, when I got to pictures 16 - 18 I wondered what the news spin was on this. The photos behind the photographer (I'm assuming) on the wall look more artful. I don't see any of the 'studio' shots (1-9) on the wall while they may be exhibited somewhere. I just wondered why the news gallery only showed the pictures of the children looking isolated and not the others. Maybe it was to make them appear more as a victim.
__________________
Whatever did happen to your soul?
I heard you sold it
Choose Heaven for the weather and Hell for the company
Last edited by shesus; 06-08-2008 at 05:31 AM..
|