Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Willravel
In the case of the Iraq War, many people didn't have access to the whole story. Those who did knew that Bush was misleading people.
As for directing you to the classes I think are best? It turns out that my opinions were quite simply wrong. Now you're ending up taking 6 years to get your BA in business.
We've arrived back at the Bush conundrum: he either lied or is quite incompetent.
I've already covered this:
|
All the intel was not correct, nor was all of it incorrect.
Have you made decisions when you have have imperfect information? When you knew it was imperfect? When you did not know it was imperfect?
At what point in your decision making do you decide you have done enough research? If you had to research an issue to "perfection" would you ever be able to make a decision?
Have you ever had research that supported a certain action but made a decision based on another reason?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Man....I wouldnt want to be a Commander in Chief and have to tell a young war widow... "I meant well, but I was either "uninformed or incompetent" and as a result, your husband died and your young child will never know his/her father." |
I would not want that either, who would?. Many Commanders in Chief have been faced with having to tell a "young war widow...", history shows that in hindsight, many lives could have been saved with better information and or better judgment. Are you suggesting there is a problem with the reliance on what turned out to be imperfect intel that has cost lives that has been unique to the Bush Administration and no other Administration?