Fraud is fraud, and is and always ought to be good reason for annulling a contract. Chastity may not be a material term to you or me, but it is to some people, and if someone enters into that contract with them based on that fraudulent claim, I think there's every reason to consider that grounds for mutual rescission.
The case is easily mischaracterized as having something to do with oppressing women. Like those above, I don't think that's the issue in the slightest.
|