|
The fact that this particular annulment pertains to women's sexuality should be immaterial. But it won't be. People simply aren't willing to be reasonable in cases like this and insist on weighing in their useless and meaningless opinions. Me? All I can say is that she's not a whore, she's a human being and deserves to be treated as such, however marriage is an agreement which is not unlike a contract. If you misrepresent yourself in the contract said contract could be void.
While the state can marry anyone the state wants, regardless of sexual history, the religion creates a definite contractual context. It's that context and how it applies to law that's in question.
I you're a member of a religion in which one can only become married after drinking 4 gallons of milk in a week, and one of the parties lies about drinking the milk, the same question of religious context pertaining to the law could be in question.
BTW, does she really want to be married to a ponce like this?
|