Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
I find it ironic that the person who's explicitely stated that the Constitutional system of checks and balances is broken doesn't understand how it works. For the record. And that's "ironic" used correctly, not in the Alanis Morrisette way.
|
I don't find it ironic at all that someone as brilliant as you is still arguing a point I conceded
days ago. (Post 91, back on Thursday).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Willravel, post 91
Edit: BTW, mea culpa about the checks and balances thing. I wasn't communicating what I was thinking correctly. It is proper checks and balances. I don't think two branches choosing the leadership of a different branch is a good idea, but it is checks and balances.
|
The executive and legislative choosing the leadership of the judicial branch IS checks and balances. How many times must I concede this point before people pay attention?