Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
ace...the IBD editorial is contrary to every recent national security estimate since the invasion of Iraq.
|
Is the data accurate? If not how?
Quote:
But of course, we all know that an IBD editorial is more objective and informed than the collected assessments of the entire US intelligence apparatus. 
|
The point is not the editorial view of the data, but the data. I know there are different way to look at this question. At what point do you want to focus on that rather than the ad hominem argument.
Quote:
From another thread:
ace...I would respectfully disagree. What I see time and again is a mouthpiece that regurgitates IBD editiorials.
|
Been through this. I read IBD daily. I enjoy the way they craft their editorials, they are fun to read. I generally agree with their point of view. I have found that data in the paper and on the editorial page to be accurate.
Do you have anything new regarding IBD? I am going to read the paper again tomorrow, if I come across something that I think will be of interest - guess what - I am going to post it. Your complaints, ad hominem arguments, and personal attacks wont matter. Come on, I know you have it in you - you can do better.