View Single Post
Old 05-29-2008, 10:46 AM   #73 (permalink)
Cynthetiq
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
I'm sorry we have established the SCOTUS is politically biased in it's determination of cases? because you've not shown or demonstrated that at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
A pattern of the Democrats picking Democratically biased justices and the Republicans picking Republican biased justices? That sounds an awful lot like the bias I've been talking about since post #13, when I mentioned that Hillary would be another partisan justice.

In the scenario presented by the OP, Obama (Dem) nominates Hillary and she's confirmed by what is almost certainly going to be a Democratic congress. Hillary Clinton, as I hope we all know, has been very liberal in both her legal and political career. Should that scenario actually play out, we'd simply be placing a Democratic yes-man on the bench, simply maintaining the status quo, which we've established is a politically biased SCOTUS.

Instead we should be nominating people who are clearly going to put justice above partisan politics. Those are the people that should be on the bench, be that the bench of the SCOTUS or even a local bench. That's the point I've been trying to make all along.
even my simple socialstudieshelp.com example showed how it's not partisan politics. You keep spouting it, but not showing how it is that besides the labels the people are given versus the ACTIONS that the people take.

further, your entire political allegiances has been completely undermined by your own post:

#61
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
- John Paul Stevens: Democrat, but Republican when nominated and confirmed by Republicans (call it the Stevens "gotcha")
- David Souter: Democract, but Republican/Centrist when nominated by Republican president George Bush 1, and confirmed by Democratic Congress
- Clarence Thomas: Republican, nominated by Republican president George Bush 1, and confirmed by Democratic Congress.
You've still not established how they are partisan.

Seriously, I feel a Willravel "Agree to disagree" coming up...
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.

Last edited by Cynthetiq; 05-29-2008 at 10:48 AM..
Cynthetiq is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360