Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Willravel
Either one is wrong. They're separate parts of a bigger problem.
You've said that they're all biased because they're coming from the parties.
I said it was a bad idea to nominate someone to the SCOTUS without any judicial experience. We need all judges from local judges up to the supreme court to be impartial. Part of being impartial is not bringing personal politics to the table.
The Supreme Court Oath:
The job requires one to be impartial.
|
No, you said it was
"stupid" to nominate those without judicial experience. I didn't say that they're biased because they're coming from political parties. I said that was the logical implication of what you've said, and I'll thank you for not putting words in my mouth since I don't happen to agree with the statement. The other logical implication of your statements is that they are not impartial.
Again, let's see something that actually has some sort of real world value. You've shown two cases where judges should have recused themselves because of personal finances. You've accused Alito of being biased towards Homeland Security cases because of his friendships without offering any proof whatsoever.